Comparison of the vessel sealer Extend® with harmonic ACE® in robotic bilateral axillary-breast approach thyroid surgery
Original Article

Comparison of the vessel sealer Extend® with harmonic ACE® in robotic bilateral axillary-breast approach thyroid surgery

Su Cheol Yang, Jong-Hyuk Ahn, Jae Hwan Kim, Jin Wook Yi, Min Hee Hur, Keon-Young Lee

Department of Surgery, Inha University Hospital & College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea

Contributions: (I) Conception and design: JW Yi; (II) Administrative support: JW Yi; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: SC Yang; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: SC Yang; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: SC Yang; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors.

Correspondence to: Jin Wook Yi. Assistant Professor, Inha University Hospital and Inha University College of Medicine, 27 Inhang-ro, Jung-gu, Incehon, 22332, Korea. Email:

Background: Harmonic ACE® (Harmonic) Curved Shears are frequently used for vessel sealing in patients undergoing robotic thyroidectomy. Unlike other robotic devices with articulation, the Harmonic device can only move in a straight-forward direction without articulation. The recently introduced Vessel Sealer Extend® (VSE) provides bipolar sealing and cutting with articulation movement. This study compared the VSE and Harmonic devices in robotic bilateral axillary-breast approach (BABA) thyroid surgery.

Methods: From December 2018 to March 2019, 35 consecutive patients underwent robotic BABA thyroidectomy, 20 using the VSE and 15 using the Harmonic device. Patient characteristics, pathologic results, and clinical outcomes, including complications, were evaluated.

Results: The characteristics of patients in the two groups were similar. Surgical time from robot docking to completion of lobectomy was longer in the VSE than in the Harmonic group (45.00±9.52 vs. 39.72±12.76 min; P=0.170). The number of camera cleanings during lobectomy was significantly lower in the VSE group (0.55±0.51 vs. 1.93±1.71; P=0.002). Intraoperative blood loss (53.00±43.29 vs. 28.67±41.03 mL; P=0.102), hospital stay after surgery (3.55±0.95 vs. 3.67±0.90 days; P=0.715), and pain scores on the first (2.85±0.37 vs. 2.93±0.26; P=0.458) and second (2.55±0.51 vs. 2.60±0.51; P=0.775) postoperative days were similar in the VSE and Harmonic groups. No patient experienced vocal cord palsy or postoperative bleeding.

Conclusions: VSE can be safely applied to robotic BABA thyroid surgery.

Keywords: Bilateral axillary-breast approach (BABA), thyroid cancer; robot thyroid surgery; oncoplastic thyroid surgery; thyroidectomy

Submitted Aug 18, 2019. Accepted for publication Nov 29, 2019.

doi: 10.21037/gs.2020.01.18


In 2016, Thyroid cancer was the fourth most common cancer in Korea. Thyroid cancer is especially prevalent in women, being the second most common type of cancer and the most common type of cancer in young women aged 15–34 years, accounting for 50.5% of cancers in the latter population (1). Although conventional open thyroidectomy is the treatment of choice, the anatomic location of the thyroid inevitably results in a scar on the anterior neck, which may increase stress and reduce quality of life, especially in young women. Cosmetically unfavorable outcomes may be avoided by the use of various remote approaches in patients at low risk of recurrence. The three most common techniques are the trans-axillary approach (TAA), trans-oral approach, and the bilateral axillary-breast approach (BABA), the latter consisting of two axillary incisions, 0.8 cm in size, and two circumareolar incisions on the breast (2). Robotic BABA thyroidectomy, first introduced in Korea in 2008, provides surgical completeness, improves surgical and cosmetic outcomes, and reduces postoperative complication rates, compared with open thyroidectomy (3-7).

Safe dissection with bleeding control during robotic BABA thyroid surgery has been provided by Harmonic ACE® (Harmonic) Curved Shears. Because the Harmonic shears do not have an endowrist function in the Da-Vinci system, they only work in a straight-forward direction, making their proper placement more difficult during thyroidectomy. The recently introduced Vessel Sealer Extend® (VSE) provides bipolar-based sealing and cutting ability with endowrist function in the Da-Vinci Xi system and has a wider range of motion than the Harmonic shears. To date, however, no studies have assessed the safety of the VSE for robotic BABA thyroid surgery. The present study therefore compares pathologic results and clinical outcomes, including complications, in patients who underwent robotic BABA thyroid surgery using the VSE and Harmonic devices.


Patients and clinical variables

Medical data and surgical videos of patients who underwent robotic BABA thyroid surgery from December 2018 to March 2019 at our institution were reviewed. Indications for robotic BABA thyroid surgery included patients with lesions confirmed or suspected to be papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) or to be benign by preoperative fine needle aspiration, cancers <2 cm in diameter on ultrasonography, benign tumors <8 cm in diameter, tumors located in the thyroid, no clinical evidence of central or lateral neck node metastasis, and no history of neck surgery or radiation exposure.

All robotic BABA thyroid operations were performed by a single endocrine surgeon. First lobectomy time was defined as the time from the initiation of midline division by the robotic device to the completion of lobectomy from the thyroid bed. Perioperative clinical parameters included time from robot docking to completion of lobectomy, number of times the camera was cleaned during lobectomy, volume of blood lost, duration of hospital stay after surgery, visual analogue pain score (0 to 10) at 9:00 am on postoperative days 1 and 2, and surgical complications. Vocal cord function was confirmed by vocal cord ultrasound in the outpatient clinic (8). Hypoparathyroidism was defined as serum parathyroid hormone concentrations (iPTH) <5 pg/mL during postoperative period and <10 pg/mL after discharge. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Inha University College of Medicine (approval number: 2019-03-007), which waived the requirement for written informed consent based on the retrospective nature of the study.


The VSE uses a refined jaw profile for precise dissection and a grasp with a textured surface to secure tissue, approaching the surgical field from a preferred angle by articulating the wrist. This device enables an optimized approach to sealing and cutting of vessels and tissues, without limiting instrumental direction. With the instrument in position, a longer electrode helps seal and cut vessels up to 7 mm in diameter or tissue bundles that fit within its jaws. When combined with the Da-Vinci surgical system, the VSE device enhances flexibility and efficiency because of the endo-wrist function, not present in conventional energy devices such as Harmonic. In this study, allocation of Harmonic or VSE was instantly assigned according to the VSE supply status.

Operative procedure

As in open conventional thyroidectomy, the patient was placed in a supine position with the neck slightly extended. Robotic BABA thyroid surgery using the Da-Vince Xi system requires two 8 mm circumareolar and two 8 mm axillary incisions. A subcutaneous and subplatysmal flap was made by hydrodissection using 1:200,000 saline with epinephrine, followed by insufflation of CO2 gas at 7 mmHg pressure and 15 mL/min flow rate to maintain a working space. As in open conventional thyroidectomy, robotic BABA thyroidectomy consisted of six steps: (I) skin incision and flap elevation; (II) midline division, isthmectomy, and lateral dissection; (III) preservation of the recurrent laryngeal nerve and the parathyroid glands; (IV) dissection of Berry’s ligament and the upper thyroid pole; (V) central lymph node dissection; and (VI) closure of the midline and the skin incision. Surgical field photographs were taken at each step, with those taken using the two devices compared.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS 20.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Categorical variables were compared using the chi-squared test, and continuous variables were compared using Student’s t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.


Patient characteristics

During the study period, 35 consecutive patients underwent robotic BABA thyroid surgery, 20 using the VSE and 15 using the Harmonic device; their baseline characteristics are compared in Table 1. Gender distribution, mean age and BMI, extent of surgery, and pathologic parameters did not differ significantly in the VSE and Harmonic groups.

Table 1
Table 1 Clinical characteristics of the study cohort
Full table

Perioperative clinical results

Photographs of strap muscle dissection and isthmectomy divided on the midline are shown in Figure 1. Because of its fully wristed articulation, the VSE was parallel to the trachea (Figure 1A). By contrast, the Harmonic device was located at an angle of approximately 60 degrees relative to the trachea (Figure 1B).

Figure 1 Strap muscle dissection and isthmectomy divided on the midline. (A) Photograph of the Vessel Sealer Extend® with fully wristed articulation; (B) Photograph of the Harmonic ACE®. V, Vessel Sealer Extend®; H, harmonic ACE®.

Thyroidectomy procedures in robotic BABA thyroid surgery are shown in Figure 2. During the lateral dissection procedure, the endowrist function could be used to move the joints of the VSE. Unlike the Harmonic, free movement of the joints with the VSE allowed extended movement of the instrument during the lateral dissection of the upper and lower parts, minimizing control of ​​the thyroid by mechanical force (Figure 2A,B). Moreover, the VSE could dissect the tissues surrounding the recurrent laryngeal nerve, while keeping the instrument parallel to the nerve. Similar results were observed during dissection using the Harmonic, but it was necessary to control thyroid tissue using prograsp forceps (Figure 2C,D). In addition, articulating movements during upper pole dissection resulted in safe dissection of the nerve from the surrounding soft tissues, creating an additional angle that could not be created with the Harmonic device. Endowrist movements allow an approach to dissected structures at a more ideal angle. In particular, narrowing of the upper part of the cricoid cartilage can allow surgery to be performed freely and safely, while ensuring vision as in open surgery due to the endowrist angle (Figure 2E,F). Furthermore, the Harmonic device has difficulties dissecting lymph nodes during central compartment dissection, because it does not bend downward; by contrast, the VSE can bend downward, making it safer and easier to dissect central compartment lymph nodes (Figure 2G,J).

Figure 2 Thyroidectomy procedures during robotic BABA thyroid surgery. Images show comparisons of the VSE and Harmonic devices at different positions and angles. Right lobe mobilization, with the middle thyroid vein ligated by the (A) VSE and (B) harmonic devices; identification of the right recurrent laryngeal nerve and dissection and division of the right thyroid upper pole using the (C) VSE and (D) harmonic devices; dissection around the cricoid cartilage using the (E) VSE and (F) harmonic devices; right side central compartment lymph node dissection using the (G) VSE and (H) harmonic devices. V, Vessel Sealer Extend®; H, harmonic ACE®; RLN, recurrent laryngeal nerve; BABA, bilateral axillary-breast approach.

Table 2 shows surgical outcomes in the two patient groups. The number of camera cleanings during first lobectomy was significantly lower in the VSE than in the Harmonic group (0.55±0.51 vs. 1.93±1.71; P=0.002). The duration of first lobectomy (45.00±9.52 vs. 39.72±12.76 min; P=0.170), volume of intraoperative blood loss (53.00±43.29 vs. 28.67±41.03 mL; P=0.102), length of hospital stay after surgery (3.55±0.95 vs. 3.67±0.90 days; P=0.715), and pain VAS scores on the first (2.85±0.37 vs. 2.93±0.26; P=0.458) and second (2.55±0.51 vs. 2.60±0.51; P=0.775) postoperative days did not differ significantly in the VSE and Harmonic groups. The incidence of postoperative complications, including transient hypoparathyroidism (15% vs. 0%; P=0.117), also did not differ significantly. No patient experienced postoperative bleeding or tracheal or esophageal injury.

Table 2
Table 2 Operative results in patients who underwent robotic BABA thyroid surgery using the VSE and Harmonic devices
Full table


Many clinical studies have assessed surgical outcomes and safety of robotic BABA thyroid surgery, finding that this method is a safe and effective remote-access thyroidectomy technique (9-22). All previous studies used the Harmonic device. This device, however, has several drawbacks, as it only permits straight-forward movement, whereas other robotic devices provide human joints with endowrist function. The Harmonic device is not parallel to the trachea during isthmectomy, which may result in tracheal injury by a Harmonic tip. Although not present in our operative results, this complication rate is reported from 0.5% to 3.3%. Previous report described that tracheal injury, attributed from the thermal effects of harmonic scalpel which needed endoscopic primary repair (23). Additional four tracheal injuries by the Harmonic were also reported in two more articles (24,25). The straight and direct entrance of the Harmonic device can result in cutting of some of the muscles during lateral side dissection. Furthermore, when dissecting tissues surrounding the recurrent laryngeal nerve, the Harmonic is rarely parallel to the nerve direction. Furthermore, the temperature of the Harmonic shaft is very high, up to 200 °C, indicating a need to use a gauze ball or other device to protect the nerve during dissection around it. The superior thyroidal vessel is difficult to dissect under direct vision using the Harmonic device, because this device must be inserted into a narrow space between the cricoid cartilage and the utmost strap muscle. It is also difficult to dissect the central node using the Harmonic because it is not bent in a downward direction. All of these limitations can only be overcome by an experienced surgeon with knowledge to orient anatomical structures in the direction of harmonic movement. In addition, the Harmonic uses ultrasonic waves, which splashes water onto the camera, dirtying its lens. Thus, the view through the camera may deteriorate during surgery, requiring frequent cleaning.

The VSE was initially developed to provide a pivoting motion to the energy device. However, the tip of the bipolar energy part is larger than that of the Harmonic. An upgraded version of this sealer uses a jaw 30% lower in size than that of the initial version. This device has several advantages: first, it includes wrist movements that bend its joints, making it easier to access hard-to-reach areas of existing tools. The VSE is parallel to the trachea, reducing its likelihood of being damaged by the tip. The movement of instruments is limited during several steps of robotic BABA thyroid surgery by, for example, tissues surrounding the recurrent laryngeal nerve or the upper pole of the thyroid, restricting access by the straight Harmonic device. Second, because robotic BABA thyroid surgery must be performed in a limited space, instruments, especially the second and fourth arms (numbered according to the Xi system), may collide. The joint bending ability of the VSE can reduce these collisions. Third, thermal damage may occur while dissecting around the nerve using an energy device. However, both blades of the VSE are fully insulated and can be utilized safely around the nerve. Fourth, the VSE device can induce spot coagulation, resulting in more precise bleeding control. In addition, because this device uses bipolar energy, water splashing is less likely to occur, reducing the number of camera cleansings.

The VSE, however, has several drawbacks. First, this new instrument is larger in size than the Harmonic device. Because robotic BABA thyroid surgery is performed in a narrower space than abdominal surgery, a larger sized instrument may be an obstacle in a narrow operation field, making fine dissection with this device more difficult than with the Harmonic. Second, because energy is not fully transferred to the tip of the jaw, it cannot dissect the tip area like a Harmonic device. Third, the VSE device requires more time to ligate and cut tissues than the Harmonic device. In addition, time is required to coagulate the blood vessels electrically, and an additional step is required to cut the ligated blood vessel by stepping on the footplate.

This study had several limitations. First, because this was a retrospective study, patients were not randomized to the VSE or Harmonic device. Although baseline characteristics were well matched in the two groups, the results may have been affected by selection bias. Second, the number of patients was not sufficient for adequate comparison. Large-scale prospective randomized controlled studies are needed to show that the VSE device is safe for robotic BABA thyroid surgery.

In conclusion, this is the first report to show that the VSE device is safe for robotic BABA thyroid surgery. Despite several drawbacks, this device has distinct advantages over existing energy devices. Further studies are needed to investigate the advantages and disadvantages of this new energy device.


Funding: This work was supported by INHA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL Research Grant.


Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. The Institutional Review Board of Inha University College of Medicine (approval number: 2019-03-007) and waived the requirement for informed consent.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See:


  1. Korea National Cancer center. Cancer registration statistics information [Internet].: Korea National Cancer Center; [cited 2019 Jan 4]. Available online:
  2. Choe JH, Kim SW, Chung KW, et al. Endoscopic thyroidectomy using a new bilateral axillo-breast approach. World J Surg 2007;31:601-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Chung YS, Choe JH, Kang KH, et al. Endoscopic thyroidectomy for thyroid malignancies:Comparison with conventional open thyroidectomy. World J Surg 2007;31:2302-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Lee KE. Outcomes of 109 patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma who underwent robotic total thyroidectomy with central node dissection via the bilateral axillo-breast approach. Surgery 2010;148:1207-13. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Lee KE, Rao J, Youn YK. Endoscopic thyroidectomy with the da Vinci robot system using the bilateral axillary breast approach (BABA) technique: Our initial experience. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2009;19:e71-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Tae K, Ji YB, Song CM, Ryu J. Robotic and Endoscopic Thyroid Surgery: Evolution and Advances. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2019;12:1-11. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Woo JW, Park I, Choe JH, Kim JH, Kim JS. Comparison of ultrasound frequency in laryngeal ultrasound for vocal cord evaluation. Surgery 2017;161:1108-12. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Siperstein AE, Berber E, Morkoyun E. The Use of the Harmonic Scalpel vs Conventional Knot Tying for Vessel Ligation in Thyroid Surgery. Arch Surg 2002;137:137-42. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Kim BS, Kang KH, Kang H, et al. Central neck dissection using a bilateral axillo-breast approach for robotic thyroidectomy: Comparison with conventional open procedure after propensity score matching. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2014;24:67-72. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. Kwon H. Bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic thyroidectomy for Graves' disease: An initial experience in a single institute. World J Surg 2013;37:1576-81. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Lee KE, Kim E. Robotic thyroidectomy by bilateral axillo-breast approach: Review of 1,026 cases and surgical completeness. Surg Endosc 2013;27:2955-62. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  12. Kim WW, Jung JH, Park HY. A single surgeon's experience and surgical outcomes of 300 robotic thyroid surgeries using a bilateral axillo-breast approach. J Surg Oncol 2015;111:135-40. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  13. Kim WW, Kim JS, Hur SM, et al. Is robotic surgery superior to endoscopic and open surgeries in thyroid cancer? World J Surg 2011;35:779-84. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  14. Lee HY, Yang IS, Hwang SB, et al. Robotic thyroid surgery for papillary thyroid carcinoma: Lessons learned from 100 consecutive surgeries. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2015;25:27-32. [PubMed]
  15. Cho JN, Park WS, Min SY, et al. Surgical outcomes of robotic thyroidectomy vs. conventional open thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid carcinoma. World J Surg Oncol 2016;14:181. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  16. Bae DS, Suh BJ, Park JK, et al. Technical, oncological, and functional safety of bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA) robotic total thyroidectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2016;26:253-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  17. Liu SYW, Kim JS. Bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic thyroidectomy: review of evidences. Gland Surgery 2017;6:250-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  18. Liu SY, Ng EK. Robotic versus open thyroidectomy for differentiated thyroid cancer: An Evidence-Based Review. Int J Endocrinol 2016;2016:4309087.
  19. Lee KE. Surgical completeness of bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic thyroidectomy: comparison with conventional open thyroidectomy after propensity score matching. Surgery 2011;150:1266-74. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  20. Kim HY, d'Ajello F, Woo SU, et al. Robotic thyroid surgery using bilateral axillo-breast approach: personal initial experience over 2 years. Minerva Chir 2012;67:39-48. [PubMed]
  21. Kwak HY, Kim HY, Lee HY, et al. Robotic thyroidectomy using bilateral axillo-breast approach: comparison of surgical results with open conventional thyroidectomy. J Surg Oncol 2015;111:141-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  22. Lee KE, Choi JY, Youn YK. Bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic thyroidectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2011;21:230-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  23. Yoon JH, Park CH, Chung WY. Gasless endoscopic thyroidectomy via an axillary approach: experience of 30 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2006;16:226-31. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  24. Maeda S, Uga T, Hayashida N, Ishigaki K, et al. Video-assisted subtotal or near-total thyroidectomy for Graves' disease. Br J Surg 2006;93:61-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  25. Kang SW, Jeong JJ, Yun JS, et al. Gasless endoscopic thyroidectomy using trans-axillary approach; surgical outcome of 581 patients. Endocr J 2009;56:361-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Yang SC, Ahn JH, Kim JH, Yi JW, Hur MH, Lee KY. Comparison of the vessel sealer Extend® with harmonic ACE® in robotic bilateral axillary-breast approach thyroid surgery. Gland Surg 2020;9(2):164-171. doi: 10.21037/gs.2020.01.18